Is the faker Satoshi a bad payer? Craig Wright still hasn’t paid off his debts

Sea urchin in pockets – If you’ve just entered the cryptosphere, you know this Craig S. Wrightt claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto – the inventor of Bitcoin (BTC) – no never have given the smallest concrete evidence of this. Besides being a fan of “intentionally false evidence” (in one judge’s own words), he who is nicknamed ” Faketoshi » would be apart of the type sore loser. or miserly (or both).

Craig Wright late in paying his damages to Hodlonaut

The mystery that surrounds Satoshi Nakamoto it has never been drilled until now, allowing some to rush into this breach. As such, Craig Wright didn’t skimp on it spending money to launch an untold number of Court case to those who questioned his self-proclamation as Satoshi.

Although the main support of crypto BSV (a Bitcoin Cash fork), Wright had even spent lavishly on one lawsuit involving BSV developers. But when it comes to pay legal debts, the cicada suddenly becomes an ant. And another extremist ant.

In October 2022, Craig Wright indeed lost the case against Hodlonautwhose only fault was – In summary – to treat it like “fraud” and to “liar”. But, until today, our Faketoshi has only not fixed yet 4 million Norwegian kroner (about 385,000 euros) due to Magnus Granath (aka Hodlonaut, on Twitter).

“Craig [Wright] he still hasn’t paid what he owes me.
He also didn’t pay that small $143 million judgment from Kleiman’s lawsuit. (…)”

Twitter account @hodlonaut

>> Don’t trust platforms to hold your cryptos? Ledger has the solution (commercial link) <

The self-proclaimed Satoshi also owes $143 million

As of a judgment handed down in March 2022, Craig Wright owes a total of 143 million dollars (!) for his family David Kleinmanhis former partner, who died in 2013. It is more precisely the brother, Ira Kleiman, who considers that Wright had illegally seized intellectual property belonging to the joint venture of the deceased.

However, as shown by I tweet from @Arthur_van_Pelt (including 1ᵉʳ quoted by Hodlonaut above), Wrigth would only not very cooperative. It’s the least we can say. In fact, the latter had to broadcast before justice a shape (“Form 1.977”). In particular with the aim of paying off his legal debt.

But since the 45-day period is mostly obsolete (the request was made on November 11, 2022) the lawyer Devin Freedman this time seeking a judge’s order for Wright to provide this form within 10 daysin the pain of his rejection “Considered a contempt of court”and therefore aggravates his case.

Will Craig risk it
Craig Wright has 10 days to provide the information requested by the court. Excerpt from the request of Ira Kleiman’s lawyer.

Taking into consideration the debts of the abyss that it begins to accumulate from wrongfully filed lawsuits and through, we better understand why Craig Wright seems to (finally!) want to settle down regarding his claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto. Will he know how to keep his tongue in his pocket? This is another story.

Whether you know who Satoshi Nakamoto is or not, protecting your bitcoins is essential! To sleep soundly, equip yourself with one Ledger secure hardware wallet, there is something for all budgets. Your safety is priceless (commercial link).

Leave a Comment