Pico 4 vs Meta Quest 2 both offer a nice VR experience, but with some differences. A comparison is necessary to determine the more efficient of the two.
Recently acquired by ByteDance, the Chinese virtual reality startup has launched a new VR headset, the Pico 4. It is known that Meta Quest 2 has experienced the same story with Meta’s acquisition of Oculus. So can we say that the Pico 4 would be a strong competitor for the popular Meta Quest 2? To reach its end, it is necessary that compare the two devices from different perspectives.
Pico 4 vs. Meta Quest 2: Concept and design
At first glance, Pico 4 vs. Meta Quest 2 doesn’t reveal much. Both are white in color with convenient AA battery powered controllers. But when you look at them more closely, their size is clearly visible.
of elegant design is more characteristic of photo 4, unlike that of the Meta Quest 2. The Pico VR headset weighs 586 grams, with a length of 310 mm and a width of 163 mm. On the other hand, Meta Quest 2 it weighs only 503 grams. Add to this its dimensions of 450mm x 224mm that make it Heavier although it is less heavy.
Both helmets use straps to keep the wearer balanced during use.
When it comes to straps, the Pico 4 vs Meta Quest 2 comparison offers a few important things. The Pico 4 comes with adjustable head straps. or SuperSkin cushion serves as a layer to prevent sweat from the wearer’s discomfort. To provide more comfort, the helmet is equipped with a non-slip PU leather on the back.
It also helps to control the device better. However, placing the battery on the back does not make it easy to remove it or replace the strap with a third-party strap.
On the other hand, Meta Quest 2’s headband is more soft to the touch. In addition, the top strap makes it possible to reinforce the fastening of the helmet, especially with the buckle that goes around the side strap. When you want to fix it on the head, just drag the left part. But there are also third-party headbands that can be used to replace the original strap.
How are the screens?
The two VR headsets both have one pass mode. It means that the user can catch a glimpse of what is happening around them while using one of them. This is a common point for both. That’s where it stops, though the Pico 4 vs Meta Quest 2 report throws one up more or less similar design.
Pico 4 displays feature a new optical system pancake lentils. This way, the screens are closer to the lenses. That’s why the box is quite thin. Indeed, the Pico VR headset has two screens of 2.56 inches each.
Each screen has a resolution of 2160 x 2160 pixels per eye. It also offers a refresh rate that can switch between 72 Hz and 90 Hz. This makes the Pico 4 quite different from the Meta Quest 2, whose screen is unique, with a resolution of 1832 x 1920 pixels per eye. The latter, however, has a refresh rate that fluctuates between 60 Hz, 72 Hz and 90 Hz.
In addition, the optical configuration of Meta Quest 2 is based on the system with fresnel lens. Therefore, there is a heavier and heavier box in the front.
Both the handsets also have similarities in terms of CPU and storage. Both are chip-enabled Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2. They have a processor eight 7nm cores. In addition, you can choose between a 128 GB or 256 GB handset. Where the Pico 4 takes the lead against the Meta Quest 2 is firstly its RAM. In fact, he has 8 GB of RAM vs. 6 GB RAM for Quest 2.
Moving on, both VR headset models offer spatial audio, although the Pico 4 doesn’t have a headphone jack like the Meta Quest 2. They also support Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.
If we talk about the field of vision, the helmet Pico 4 offers a wider vision 105 degrees compared to Meta Quest 2 which only has 89 degrees.
As for the power supply, the Pico 4 operates using a battery of 5300 mAh with the option of 20W fast charging through a USB-C port. The Meta Quest 2 has a 3,640 mAh that also charges via a USB-C port. His adapter 10 W reaches a full charge in 2.5 hours.
The Meta Quest 2 battery lasts up to 2 hours, which is an hour less than the Pico 4 when fully charged. However, the user can optimize his autonomy with a Elite belt. This doubles its lifespan.
Pico 4 vs. Meta Quest 2: Controllers
of photo 4just like Meta Quest 2 comes with a pair of controllers equipped with a technology of haptic feedback AND intuitive layouts. However, there are some divergent points.
For Pico 4, 4 fisheye camera the corners are placed in an arc in the hands. This tracks the infrared (IR) LEDs on the controllers. In addition, Pico controllers offer better game control with its wide range engine. HyperSense Ribbon.
For its part, the Meta Quest 2 has a pair of controllers where infrared (IR) LEDs are arranged in a ring in front of the user’s hand. Not only are they more ergonomic, but the Quest 2 controllers have access to more precise movements. This greatly reduces latency at a tracking rate of 60Hz. In addition, motion control is improved as it has or built-in accelerometer and gyroscope.
In terms of spatial positioning, both brands have invested in 6 DoF. This allows the user to have a full vision when you use it. But it should be noted that Pico 4 can also work with it motion trackers with 3DoF positioning which the user must attach to his feet.
So much for accepting that comfort is assured. But regardless of whether one chooses one or the other, the Pico 4 vs Meta Quest 2 comparison is worth making. Both products are only available in a very limited number of countries. Let’s see this in the next paragraph.
Price and availability
The Pico 4 offers two storage options of 128GB and 256GB. Prices therefore vary from version to version. First costs €429 when necessary €499 to win the second. On the other hand, Meta Quest 2 is available at a higher price. If the 128 GB version costs €449, the one with 256 GB memory costs €549.
If we compare the prices, we can remember that the Pico 4 is more affordable, especially since it offers the best specifications. However, the model is only available in a few countries in Europe, including France, Japan and South Korea.
As for Meta Quest 2, it is now available in about twenty countries, especially in Europe. It is also found in the United States, Canada and Australia, not to mention Japan and South Korea. Being so, in France, one can easily get it on amazon.
Pico 4 vs Meta Quest 2: What about the VR experience?
The VR experience is definitely there for both headsets. Only, we can’t say that the Pico 4 helmet measures up to the Meta Quest 2, seen from this angle. We know that Meta has an extensive library of exclusive games most recently including Resident Evil 4 and, possibly in the near future, Assassin’s Creed VR.
If the franchise evolves at such a speed, the Pico 4 won’t even be able to know its peak before making its way into the Meta’s arsenal. Oculus Quest 3 and Project Cambria will soon join the VR headset market.
In contrast, the current Pico 4 library promises to offer no less fun games. You can also enjoy upcoming games like The Walking Dead: Saints and Sinners Chapter 2 and The Peaky Blinders: The King’s Ransom. Also, there are rumors about the dance game, just dancewho will be exclusive to Pico 4 at his departure in the year 2023. Therefore dance fans will not need to subscribe to Facebook to enjoy it.
Pico 4 vs. Meta Quest 2: Which one to choose?
The choice remains subjective, although there are several points to note. First, the comparison of Pico 4 vs Meta Quest 2 led to the conclusion that each of the two has its own the specifics. But if that’s all that matters, you’d better choose it photo 4. However, the big players will rely more on Meta Quest 2 which has one extended game library.